Tesla Shows Roadster With Thrusters in Texas, Sparking Flying Car Debate
Elon Musk showed the electric sports car spinning and landing on air jets, but the BBC's technology editor says flying cars are far from public roads
By AXY Business Desk ·

Key points
- Elon Musk unveiled a new Tesla Roadster fitted with thrusters at a SpaceX-owned facility in Texas, according to a BBC report published on 16 October 2026.
- The demonstration showed the car driving up and off a steep ramp, spinning in the air and landing using air jets.
- Musk said an audience was needed to prove the car is not AI, reflecting public doubt about dramatic product footage.
- The BBC's technology editor Zoe Kleinman has explained why a flying car is unlikely on roads soon.
- Aviation rules, battery energy limits and road safety are major obstacles to any road-going flying car.
Tesla chief executive Elon Musk has unveiled a new version of the Roadster, the company's electric sports car, fitted with thrusters that apparently allow it to hover and turn in mid-air. The vehicle was shown at a facility in Texas owned by SpaceX, Musk's rocket and satellite company, which helped develop the model, according to a BBC Business video report published on 16 October 2026. Before the presentation, Musk told the audience, "You're going to see some crazy stuff tonight."
In the demonstration, the Roadster was driven up and off a steep ramp, spun in the air and landed using air jets. Musk said an audience was needed to prove the car "is not AI", a remark that reflects how sceptical viewers have become of dramatic product footage. The BBC's technology editor, Zoe Kleinman, has explained why a flying car is unlikely to reach ordinary roads soon, and the BBC's video report points viewers to that analysis.
The headline question, whether Tesla has really unveiled a flying car, depends on what the word means. The footage described in the report shows a car leaving a ramp, rotating and touching down with the help of jets. That is a striking engineering display, but it is different from a vehicle that takes off from the ground, flies a route through open air and lands where its driver chooses. The BBC report describes the thrusters as apparently allowing the car to hover, which suggests the claim has not yet been tested in the way a regulator or a customer would test it.
What was shown in Texas
The event took place at a facility owned by SpaceX, which the BBC said helped develop the model. Musk presented the car himself, building suspense before the demonstration with a promise of unusual content. The report describes three main actions: the car driving up a steep ramp, spinning while in the air, and landing with the help of air jets. The BBC did not provide a detailed technical breakdown of the thrusters, their power, or how long the vehicle stayed airborne, so those details remain unclear from the available reporting.
The choice of venue is significant. A controlled facility allows engineers to control conditions, clear the area and limit risk. It is also a setting where a company can present a product on its own terms, with its own camera angles and timing. That is common for technology launches, but it means outside observers have to rely on what the company shows and what independent reporters are able to confirm.
How the Roadster reached this point
The Roadster has been part of Tesla's story since the company's early years. The original Roadster, launched in 2008, was Tesla's first production car and an early sign that an electric vehicle could be quick and desirable. It was built on a sports car platform and helped establish the idea that electric cars did not have to be slow or dull. That early model is widely credited with showing investors and buyers that Tesla could make a product that stood apart from conventional electric vehicles of the time.
Tesla later announced a second-generation Roadster in 2017, with performance claims that drew wide attention. The launch of that model was repeatedly delayed, and for years the company's sports car remained more of a promise than a product on sale. Delays of this kind are common in the car industry, but they are especially visible when a company has made bold claims about speed, range or design. The version shown in Texas is the latest stage of that long-running project, and the BBC report links it to the SpaceX facility where it was presented.
The link to SpaceX is unusual for a car. Musk leads both companies, and SpaceX is known for using thrusters to control spacecraft in orbit and to guide landings, including on its Dragon crew capsule. Engineers who work on rockets and capsules have experience with small propulsion systems, which may help explain why the two companies were involved in the same project. The BBC report did not say how the work was divided between them, so the precise contribution of each company is not clear.
How thrusters could make a car hover
A vehicle that hovers needs a propulsion system that produces enough upward force to counter its weight, along with control systems that keep it level and allow it to rotate. Thrusters work by pushing gas or air out in one direction so that the vehicle is pushed in the opposite direction, in line with Newton's third law of motion. The same basic principle lets rockets climb and spacecraft adjust their orientation in space.
For a car, the challenge is much harder than for a drone. Drones are light and use rotors designed for flight, while a sports car is heavy, and its structure, seats, wheels and battery all add to the load that must be lifted. Thrusters of this kind can be effective for short hops, but they consume large amounts of energy in a short time. That matters for a battery-powered vehicle, because the energy needed to lift a car is far greater than the energy needed to drive it along a road.
The demonstration also raises practical questions about noise, heat and the surface beneath the vehicle. Jets strong enough to support a car can throw up dust, debris and hot exhaust, and they can be loud enough to be a serious issue near people. A prepared test area can manage those risks. A public street, with pedestrians, parked cars, power lines and buildings, presents a far more difficult environment.
Why a flying car is unlikely on roads soon
The BBC's technology editor, Zoe Kleinman, has explained several reasons a flying car is unlikely to reach ordinary roads soon. The BBC video report itself does not list those reasons, so readers who want the full argument should look at the separate BBC analysis. Based on the general obstacles that apply to any flying vehicle, the main barriers are regulation, energy, and infrastructure and safety.
Regulation is the first and most significant barrier. A car that leaves the ground enters the rules of aviation as well as motor vehicle law. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration sets standards for aircraft design, testing and operation. In Europe, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency fills a similar role. Aircraft typically need a formal certification process that involves detailed documentation, testing and approval before they can carry passengers. That process can take years, and the BBC report does not indicate that the Roadster has received any aviation approval.
The second barrier is energy. Jet fuel stores far more energy per kilogram than the lithium-ion batteries used in electric cars. A vehicle that must carry its own power source while also lifting itself into the air faces a difficult balance between weight, range and safety. Limited flight time would restrict where such a vehicle could operate, and a battery fault in the air would carry far more serious consequences than a fault on the road.
The third barrier is infrastructure and safety. Roads are not designed for vehicles that take off and land, and airspace is managed by air traffic systems that would need to accommodate many more low-flying machines. Insurance, emergency services and local planning rules would all have to adapt. Each of these changes takes time, money and public agreement, which is why a demonstration in a controlled setting is a long way from a product that a driver could use on a daily commute.
Why the 'not AI' remark matters
Musk's comment that an audience was needed to prove the car "is not AI" points to a wider issue for technology companies. Viewers now encounter many videos that are edited, staged or generated by computers, and a striking clip can spread quickly before anyone checks how it was made. A remark like Musk's acknowledges that doubt directly, while also making the audience part of the proof.
Companies that want demonstrations to be trusted often invite independent observers, release full footage, or allow journalists to see products in person. Those steps make it harder for a viewer to dismiss a claim as a trick. Whether Tesla provides that level of openness for the Roadster will shape how seriously the public, investors and regulators treat its claims.
For ordinary readers, the practical question is simple: when a company shows a remarkable product, what evidence confirms that it works as shown? A live demonstration is a stronger signal than a short clip, but it still does not prove that a vehicle is safe, reliable or ready for sale. Those tests usually require independent data, documented engineering results and, for any vehicle that flies, approval from aviation authorities.
What to watch next
The most useful next step would be further detail from Tesla or SpaceX about the vehicle's design, testing and intended use. Information about the thrusters' power, how long the car can stay airborne, its safety systems and any planned regulatory approach would help separate a technical milestone from a promotional event. Independent engineers and aviation regulators are likely to examine such details closely.
Readers should also watch for any announcement of pricing, production timelines or customer trials. Until those arrive, the demonstration is best understood as a showcase of an experimental project rather than the launch of a product people can buy. Analysts who follow Tesla often judge its announcements by what follows them, so the real test will be whether the company publishes data, opens the project to outside scrutiny and sets a clear path toward approval.
For now, the BBC's reporting supports a narrower conclusion than the headline suggests. Tesla has shown a Roadster fitted with thrusters that appear to allow it to hover and turn, and it has landed using air jets. Whether that counts as a flying car will depend on what the company does next, and whether a vehicle of this kind can meet the standards required before it is used beyond a controlled facility.
Topics: Tesla, Elon Musk, Roadster, SpaceX, Texas, Flying cars, Electric vehicles
Sources: BBC Business