Flutter to Cut Up to 1,400 Jobs, Blaming UK Betting Tax Rises
Chief executive says the company 'cannot fully absorb' higher betting duties introduced in the Budget
By AXY Business Desk ·

Key points
- Flutter, owner of Paddy Power, plans to cut up to 1,400 jobs across the UK, Ireland, Portugal and Romania.
- The company says it cannot fully absorb tax rises on online casino and sports betting from the last Budget.
- Remote gaming duty on online casino betting rose from 21% to 40% in April, and online sports betting duty is set to rise from 15% to 25% next April.
- Flutter's chief executive argues the tax changes have fuelled the unlicensed, unregulated market, a claim the source presents as the company's view.
- Flutter has not disclosed which roles are at risk.
Flutter, the owner of Paddy Power, has announced plans to cut up to 1,400 jobs, saying the company cannot absorb the tax increases the UK government imposed on online casino and sports betting. The announcement, made on Tuesday 20 October, affects staff in the UK and Ireland as well as British and Irish workers at Flutter's sites in Portugal and Romania. The company has not said which roles are at risk.
What Flutter has announced
Flutter said the job cuts are part of a restructuring of its business. Kevin Harrington, chief executive of Flutter's UK and Ireland business, said the company had warned about the impact of the tax changes a year earlier. In his words, 'As we warned a year ago, we cannot fully absorb a rise of this magnitude without reducing our fixed cost base and therefore must restructure our business so that we can best position ourselves for the future.'
A fixed cost base refers to the expenses a company pays regardless of how much business it does, such as salaries, leases and technology contracts. By reducing these costs, a company can offset a rise in taxes that it cannot pass on to customers. Flutter's statement suggests that the tax increases were large enough that trimming costs was the company's main response.
Flutter employs 28,500 people worldwide, including 9,000 in the UK and Ireland. The company also owns Sky Bet and Betfair, two of the best-known betting brands in Britain. Up to 1,400 jobs would represent a little under 5 per cent of its global workforce, though the cuts are concentrated in a part of the business that Flutter says is under the most financial pressure.
The Budget changes explained
The tax changes at the centre of this story were announced in the Budget last November. The government increased taxes on online casino and sports betting, while exempting horse racing. The changes are split across two main duties, and their timing differs.
Remote gaming duty is paid by operators on online casino betting. Under the Budget changes, the rate rose from 21 per cent to 40 per cent, and this increase took effect in April. For a company whose online casino business is large, a near doubling of the rate is a significant change to the amount of money it can keep from each pound wagered.
General betting duty applies to other forms of sports betting. It was kept at 15 per cent for bets placed in betting shops. For online sports betting, however, the rate is set to rise from 15 per cent to 25 per cent from April next year. This means that the largest online increase on sports betting has yet to take effect, and firms are still planning for it.
The result is that online operators face higher costs now and a further increase in the near future, while physical betting shops face a smaller change. Flutter's comments indicate that the company sees the online changes as the main pressure on its business.
Industry warnings and government response
Before the Budget, betting companies warned that higher costs would lead to job losses and the closure of betting shops. Those warnings were dismissed by MPs, who described them as 'scaremongering'. Flutter's announcement suggests that the industry's concerns are now becoming concrete, at least for the company's own staff.
Flutter's chief executive has argued that the tax changes have 'fundamentally changed' the economic model of the UK betting and gaming industry. He also argued that the higher taxes had helped 'fuel the unlicensed, unregulated market'. This claim links the tax increase to a long-running concern in the sector. Unlicensed operators are companies that offer gambling to British customers without holding a UK licence. Because they do not pay UK duties and do not follow UK consumer protection rules, the industry and regulators have long worried that higher taxes on licensed firms push customers toward them. The source material does not include evidence for how large this effect is, and it should be treated as Flutter's view rather than an established finding.
Flutter said on Tuesday, 'We continue to expect these tax increases to have a very significant impact on the overall market.' The statement suggests the company expects the changes to affect more than its own business, including the wider industry and the number of betting shops and jobs across the sector.
Market and listing context
The announcement comes after another change for the company. Flutter delisted from the London Stock Exchange in August, and its shares are now traded only in New York. The move was seen by some as a blow to the UK financial market, because a major company leaving the London market can reduce investor interest and the number of firms listed in the UK. Flutter's decision to trade only in New York shows how a large company can choose a different market even while most of its staff and customers are in Britain and Ireland.
The source material does not say whether the listing change is linked to the job cuts. Readers should therefore treat the two developments as separate facts that are both part of the company's current position rather than as a confirmed chain of cause and effect.
Why the job cuts matter beyond the company
For the people affected, the most immediate concern is employment. Flutter has not disclosed which roles are at risk, so staff in customer service, technology, marketing, or other functions may be uncertain about their futures until further details are released. Because the cuts also affect sites in Portugal and Romania, the consequences extend beyond the UK and Ireland.
For consumers, the wider question is how betting firms respond to higher taxes. Companies can cut costs, raise prices, reduce promotions, close shops, or move customers to other products. The source material does not indicate which of these steps Flutter plans to take beyond restructuring. Analysts often watch for changes in marketing and bonus offers after a tax rise, because these can signal how a firm plans to protect its margins.
For the public finances, higher gambling taxes raise revenue for the government, but the Budget's effect depends on how much business remains with licensed operators. If customers move to unlicensed sites, the government may collect less than expected while the risk to consumers grows. This is the central argument that the industry has made, and it is the reason the issue is likely to remain contested.
What could happen next
Several developments are worth watching. The first is the detail of the restructuring. Flutter has said up to 1,400 jobs could be affected, but it has not yet said how many roles will go in each country or when the cuts will take effect. Further updates from the company would clarify the scale of the changes.
The second is the April increase in general betting duty for online sports betting. This rise, from 15 per cent to 25 per cent, is still to come. If it proceeds as planned, other operators may announce similar cost-cutting measures, and the pressure described by Flutter could spread across the industry.
The third is the response from the government and MPs. The Budget changes were defended in Parliament, and the dismissal of industry warnings as scaremongering suggests the government does not expect the tax policy to change quickly. Analysts may watch for any new evidence on job losses, betting shop closures, or the size of the unlicensed market, because such evidence could shape future debate about gambling taxation.
Finally, customers and staff will be watching for practical changes. For now, the source material confirms the job cut estimate, the tax rates, and the company's explanation. It does not provide details on prices, product changes, or which sites may close, so those questions remain open.
Questions and answers
Why is Flutter cutting jobs?
Flutter says it cannot fully absorb tax rises on online casino and sports betting introduced in the last Budget. It says it must reduce its fixed cost base and restructure the business to prepare for the future.
How many jobs will Flutter cut?
Flutter has announced plans to cut up to 1,400 jobs. Staff in the UK and Ireland, as well as British and Irish workers at its sites in Portugal and Romania, will be affected, but the company has not disclosed which roles are at risk.
What betting tax rises have taken effect?
Remote gaming duty on online casino betting rose from 21% to 40% and took effect in April. General betting duty for online sports betting is set to rise from 15% to 25% in April next year, while the rate for betting shops was kept at 15%.
Why did Flutter leave the London Stock Exchange?
Flutter delisted from the London Stock Exchange in August, and its shares are now traded only in New York. The source material does not give a reason for the move beyond describing it as a blow to the UK.
Topics: Flutter, Paddy Power, Betting tax, UK gambling industry, Job cuts, Remote gaming duty, Sky Bet, Kevin Harrington
Sources: BBC Business RSS
https://axynewsglobal.com/article/flutter-to-cut-up-to-1-400-jobs-blaming-uk-betting-tax-rises